Green packaging is here to say or so they say this time. This is the third attempt to make the packaging industry more environmentally aware and to offer sensible solutions to solving the problem. There are several reasons behind the previous failures but mostly it was because the consumer wasn't ready, it cost too much and it wasn't all that popular with the majority of the public.
Now the consumer is ready to support more eco friendly packaging alternatives.
But at this point they are totally confused by the reality of it all. What constitutes environmentally or sustainable packaging?
There are many eco terms used by the packaging industry and other organizations that are misunderstood and in many cases (according to the FTC misrepresented.) The term coined to cover this phraseology is called 'Greenwashing'. By definition Greenwashing is the practice of making an unsubstantiated or misleading claim about the environmental benefits of a product, service, technology or company practice.
In the case of packaging you will hear terms such as, bioplastics, bioresins, compostable, biodegradable, sustainable, recyclable, all used to reinforce an environmentally friendly packaging message. The problem is much of this is misleading nomenclature, or at the very least misunderstood. Yet companies are clamoring to come up with the latest buzz phrase to capture that elusive consumer who wants less packaging, packaging reduction or packaging that can be repurposed in a different way.
But less packaging or a different packaging material is not the answer. We need to look at packaging holistically that is from the raw materials used through the manufacturing process to the ultimate disposal. Think about how packaging can be integrated into the entire big picture.
What most consumers don't understand is that we can't have products without packaging and what manufactures and CPG's don't understand is that consumers want to see lees of it. There in lies the problem, miscommunication!
There are numerous fabulous examples such as Terracycle repurposing packaging into other products or companies like Method that has done an incredible job of designing packaging that used over and over again by using refills (using much less packaging) or the old standby example of source reduction the Ultra detergents. These are a start towards feasible less packaging and packaging reduction solutions.
But the bottom line is how can we design and incorporate packaging so that products arrive undamaged, sanitary and uncontaminated while educating and informing the consumer, selling the product, yet contribute a minimum amount of packaging material to the waste stream' That's the answer the packaging companies should be seeking.
As a start, consider these 6 R's in your package design process.
Reduce: That is use less packaging where possible. Example the Ultra detergents.
Refill: Have a container that can be easily refilled with products using a lot less packaging material.
Example: Method
Repurpose: Design the packaging with another purpose in mind after it has been consumed.
Examples: Packaging that turns into other products.
Recycle: Partner with a company that will turn use packaging into something else.
Example: Teracycle
Reuse: By products in packaging that can be used over and over again.
Example: Refillable water bottles.
Renew: Consider using packaging from the renewal natural resources.
Example Cargo Plant Love (plantable container)
So rethink the entire packaging equation from conception to disposal. Don't continue to packaging things the same old way just because it's been done that way for years. Less packaging is not the answer it's just one of many environmentally-friendly packaging solutions.
JoAnn Hines
@packagingdiva
~Many thanks to JoAnn Hines for the post. Amazon Green Scene